English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Simple algorithms are presented for the relationships between the gravimetrically measured PM2.5 mass concentration and a nephelometer particle scattering coefficient, for three different environments: two outdoor locations (an urban and a suburban) and one indoors. With these algorithms, the aerosol light scattering coefficients of the nephelometer (provided on line with a time step of seconds) can be related to PM2.5 mass concentrations. The effect of the relative humidity on the nephelometer readings was also evaluated with two models. In the last two campaigns (in the suburbs of the city and in a laboratory), a drying device before the aerosol entrance to the nephelometer was used, a Nafion™ dryer. In the indoor environment, the two methods (the gravimetric and the nephelometry) were compared with the readings of an aerosol light scattering spectrometer, which provide PM2.5 volume concentrations and thus it was possible to calculate the PM2.5 density indoors.

Nephelometer Sensitivities for the Determination of PM2.5 Mass Concentration in Ambient and Indoor Air