English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Electronic exams (e-exams) have the potential to substantially reduce theeffort required for conducting an exam through automation. Yet, care must betaken to sacrifice neither task complexity nor constructive alignment norgrading fairness in favor of automation. To advance automation in the designand fair grading of (functional programming) e-exams, we introduce thefollowing: A novel algorithm to check Proof Puzzles based on finding correctsequences of proof lines that improves fairness compared to an existing, editdistance based algorithm; an open-source static analysis tool to check sourcecode for task relevant features by traversing the abstract syntax tree; ahigher-level language and open-source tool to specify regular expressions thatmakes creating complex regular expressions less error-prone. Our findings areembedded in a complete experience report on transforming a paper exam to ane-exam. We evaluated the resulting e-exam by analyzing the degree of automationin the grading process, asking students for their opinion, and criticallyreviewing our own experiences. Almost all tasks can be graded automatically atleast in part (correct solutions can almost always be detected as such), thestudents agree that an e-exam is a fitting examination format for the coursebut are split on how well they can express their thoughts compared to a paperexam, and examiners enjoy a more time-efficient grading process while the pointdistribution in the exam results was almost exactly the same compared to apaper exam.

Computer Aided Design and Grading for an Electronic Functional Programming Exam