English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Proponents of the Distributed Morphology framework have posited the existenceof two levels of morphological word formation: a lower one, leading to looseinput-output semantic relationships; and an upper one, leading to tightinput-output semantic relationships. In this work, we propose to test thevalidity of this assumption in the context of Hebrew word embeddings. If thetwo-level hypothesis is borne out, we expect state-of-the-art Hebrew wordembeddings to encode (1) a noun, (2) a denominal derived from it (via anupper-level operation), and (3) a verb related to the noun (via a lower-leveloperation on the noun's root), in such a way that the denominal (2) should becloser in the embedding space to the noun (1) than the related verb (3) is tothe same noun (1). We report that this hypothesis is verified by four embeddingmodels of Hebrew: fastText, GloVe, Word2Vec and AlephBERT. This suggests thatword embedding models are able to capture complex and fine-grained semanticproperties that are morphologically motivated.

Word-Embeddings Distinguish Denominal and Root-Derived Verbs in Semitic