English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

In an earlier paper [Rational choice and AGM belief revision, ArtificialIntelligence, 2009] a correspondence was established between the choicestructures of revealed-preference theory (developed in economics) and thesyntactic belief revision functions of the AGM theory (developed in philosophyand computer science). In this paper we extend the re-interpretation of (ageneralized notion of) choice structure in terms of belief revision by adding:(1) the possibility that an item of "information" might be discarded as notcredible (thus dropping the AGM success axiom) and (2) the possibility that anitem of information, while not accepted as fully credible, may still be "takenseriously" (we call such items of information "allowable"). We establish acorrespondence between generalized choice structures (GCS) and AGM beliefrevision; furthermore, we provide a syntactic analysis of the proposed notionof belief revision, which we call filtered belief revision.

Credible Information, Allowable Information and Belief Revision -- Extended Abstract