English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Shelf life estimation procedures, following ICH guidelines, use multiple batch regression with fixed batch effects. This guidance specifically mandates estimates based on at least 3 batches. Technically, the fixedbatch model limits inference to the batches actually observed, whereas ICH requires resulting estimates to apply to all future batches stored under similar conditions. This creates a conflict between the model used and the inference space the model is intended to address. Quinlan, et al. [6] and Schwenke [8] studied the small sample behavior of this procedure. Both studies revealed large sampling variation associated with the ICH procedure, producing a substantial proportion of extremely low and extremely high estimates. Quinlan, et. al [5] also considered alternative approaches including mixed models with random batch effects. While this eliminated the conflict between model and intended inference space, there were still problems with the mixed model approaches Quinlan considered. We present a Bayesian augmented mixed model approach to shelf life estimation that takes advantage of the theoretical benefits of the mixed model and uses prior information about variance components to improve accuracy of shelf life estimation procedure.

Best Linear Unbiased Prediction: an Illustration Based on, but Not Limited to, Shelf Life Estimation