English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

The main role of the Qur’an as a guidance, together with the need for the best and the proper interpretation, perhaps that is what prompted the Scholars to determine the Syurut al-Mufassir. This SM in the author's view has relevance to the existing interpretation methods. With the assumtion that each methods of interpretation have the differences of SM. So the author’s hypothesis is that the SM (which is considered normative) are actually can only change over time. The author intends to inspect more deeply, to what extent the SM can be appropriate and targeted to mufassir candidates who use various methods of interpretation. In other words, the author will try to look back at the content or points that exist in the SM that has been stated by classical and modern Scholars, then analyze them based on their relation to the existing interpretation methods, both classical and modern methods.

The Discourse of Syurut al-Mufassir Among Traditional and Modern Scholars: A Content Analysis