English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

The language used by the Panel of Judges in court has its own uniqueness. The purpose of this study was to analyze the representation of power in the Panel of Judges' in the Semarang District Court’s trial. This research uses sociopragmatic approach. The data used is a fragment of the Panel of Judges' speeches which allegedly contains pragmatic power and representation of power in it. Data collection was carried out by referring to proficient free technique, note-taking and recording techniques. Data analysis is done using the equivalent method. The data analysis technique used in this study is the determining element sorting technique. Representation of power analyzed using contextual methods. The results of the research show the power of the panel of judges' speeches in the trial representing power that comes from coercive, reward power, legitimate, expertise and referent power.

proceedings of the proceedings of the 5th international conference on science, education and technology, iset 2019, 29th june 2019, semarang, central java, indonesia

Representation of Power in The Panel of Judges’s Speech at Semarang District Court's Trial: Sosiopragmatic Study