English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Quick Tender is an innovation carried out by the state by cutting the evaluation of elections and leaving evaluation of prices. It is expected that the procurement of goods needed by the government is available and can be done quickly. The Quick Tender has been carried out by the Goods and Services Procurement Department but is not fully successful. It was noted that in 2019 there was a provider determined as the election working group or better known as the tender committee but resigned because they felt unable to fulfill the package. This study aims to look at the implementation of a rapid tender conducted by the Working Group and identify why the problem of the provider who has been designated as a tender resigned. Research using qualitative methods. Data collection techniques using interviews and documentation. this research lasted for three months. The theory used in analyzing this policy uses four variables of the George C. Edward III implementation model with the result that in the process of selecting a fast tender for other goods / construction / service providers by utilizing the Performance Information System for Goods / Services Providers (SIKaP) which do not require qualification assessment, administrative, and technical stages according to the provisions of LKPP Regulation No. 19 of 2018 but the credibility of the data from SIKaP has not been confirmed and cannot describe the mastery of the ability of providers to carry out the work won. This research concludes that there is a need to improve the SIKaP and the application of a fast tender (SPSE) to support the implementation of a fast tender that only evaluates prices. Keyword: policy implementation, quick tender, LPSE, SPSE

Quick Tender Policy Implementation on Procurement of Goods and Services in the Government of East Java Province