English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Religious freedom is assured in the 1945 Constitution (Amendment) Article 29 and Article 28 E. Nevertheless, there are laws which restrict the religious freedom of indigenous people. The institution that has the power to correct the provision of the law is contrary to the Constitution is Constitutional Court (CC). The CC was decided on the interpretation of religion and belief on Blasphemy Law and Population Administrative Law. The purpose of this article is to define and analyze the interpretation of religion and belief in the Constitution, Legislation and Constitutional Court Verdicts. It is also examining the impact of CC Verdict for the sustainability of indigenous people belief in Indonesia. The study of this paper is normative legal research with statute, concept and analysis approach. The result of this article is CC verdict states that Population Administrative Law is contradicted with the Constitution. The study will support the implementation of the Constitutional Court Verdict on Population Administrative Law to make implementing regulations to give access to basic needs and to provide public services for indigenous people believe.

Religion and Belief in the Constitutional Court Verdicts and its Implications for Sustainability of Indigenous People Belief in Indonesia