English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

This paper discusses the comparison between national contract standards (Presidential decree, the Minister of PUPR Regulation) and international standards that refer to FIDIC. In this study, an analysis carried out on the rights and obligations of service users and service providers, the legal aspects of contracts that refer to national and international standards (FIDIC). The method used is a literature study consists of three documents (Presidential decree, Ministry of Public Works, and FIDIC). The analysis shows that national contract standards (Presidential decree) and FIDIC international standards have similar regulations in many items. Finally, compared to the ministry of the public works contract document, the FIDIC document standard is more effective to use because the contractor has fair and balanced requirements, and accommodates the possibility of unwanted disputes in the future.

A Comparative Study of National and International Contracts Document refers to the FIDIC standard on Construction Projects in Indonesia