English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

The accumulation of cases at the level of investigation, prosecution, trial, and fully loaded of the penitentiary are caused by the unfair model of criminal liability principles in the Criminal Code. According to the Criminal Code, if a person's actions meet the elements of the formulation of the offense in the Act and the perpetrator can be responsible, then the perpetrator must be punished, even if mediation has occurred among offender and victim. Therefore, it is needed to develop a model of fair criminal liability principle. This study used the socio-legal approach method by using descriptiveanalytical specifications. The respondents are police, prosecutors, judges, and correctional officers. The results of the consequences by using the principle of legality and the model of the formulation of a single jail sanction cause law enforcers to always demand and drop prison. According to the Criminal Code mediation, it does not guarantee to stop the criminal proceedings. An alternative that fits Pancasila's justice value is to incorporate meditation as one of the reasons for the abolition of criminal sanction in the Criminal Code, so there is a guarantee of justice and legal certainty for the perpetrators and victims.

Development of Criminal Liability Model in Indonesian Criminal Code Based on Pancasila Justice Value