English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Background Many forms of bronchoscopic lung volume reduction were introduced as a treatment for patients with emphysema surpassing the surgical management and its fatality. Biological bronchoscopic lung volume reduction (BBLVR) proved to be a safe and competent solution inducing collapse of the emphysematous segment(s). Impulse oscillometry (IOS) constitutes an effortless but underused surrogate to spirometry in assessment of pulmonary function. Therefore, the aim of this study was to evaluate the use of IOS before and after BBLVRwith histoacryl gel in comparison with spirometry among patients with emphysema.

Assessment of lung functions using impulse oscillometry before and after bronchoscopic lung volume reduction with histoacryl gel