English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

1. Compagnone G, Baleni MC, Pagan L, Calzolaio F, Barozzi L, Bergamini C. Comparison of radiation doses to patients undergoing standard radiographic examinations with conventional screen–film radiography, computed radiography and direct digital radiography. Br J Radiol 2006;79:899‐904. 2. Ozcete E, Boydak B, Ersel M, Kiyan S, Uz I, Cevrim O. Comparison of conventional radiography and digital computerized radiography in patients presenting to emergency department. Turk J Emerg Med 2015;15:8‐12. 3. Willis CE. Computed radiography: A higher dose? Pediatr Radiol 2002;32:745‐50.

annals of cardiac anaesthesia/annals of cardiac anaesthesia

Volume change following valsalva: A Valuable tool to be incorporated in the stepwise technique for central venous catheter placement under ultrasound guidance: An opinion