English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Context: Head and neck cancers (HNCs) include malignancies of oral cavity, nasopharynx, oropharynx, hypopharynx, larynx, paranasal sinuses, and major and minor salivary glands. Worldwide incidence of HNC cases is 4.8%, whereas in India, it is 14.3%.Aims: Evaluation and comparison of the efficacy, tolerability, and toxicity of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) with docetaxel, carboplatin, and 5-fluorouracil (TPF) followed by concomitant chemoradiation in one group, accelerated radiation therapy (RT) in second group, and conventional RT in third group.Subjects and Methods: The present randomized prospective study was conducted on locally advanced head and neck carcinoma patients who were randomly divided into three groups. All patients received NACT with 3-weekly TPF, for 3-courses. Group I-patients received concomitant conventional RT, 64 Gy/32 fractions/6.2-week along with three weekly carboplatin 300 mg/m2 × 3-cycles. Group II-patients received accelerated RT given six fractions per week, total dose 64 Gy/32 fractions/5.2-week. Group III-patients received conventional RT, 64 Gy/32 fractions/6.2-week.Results: The overall response rate to NACT was 100% in all groups. At last follow-up, in Group I – 52% remained alive with no evidence of disease (NED), 39% remained alive with residual disease, and 9% had locoregional recurrence. In Group II – 46% remained alive with NED, 46% remained alive with disease, 8% had locoregional recurrence, whereas in Group III – 40% remained alive with NED, 44% remained alive with disease, and 16% had locoregional recurrence.Conclusions: NACT followed by concomitant chemoradiation is a better treatment protocol as compared to accelerated RT or conventional radiotherapy, in terms of better complete response rates with acceptable toxicity profile

asian journal of oncology

A comparative evaluation of neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by concomitant chemoradiation versus accelerated radiation therapy versus conventional radiation therapy in a locally advanced head and neck carcinoma