z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Commentary on - "Comparison of the efficacy and safety of once-daily dosing and on-demand use of udenafil for type 2 diabetic patients with erectile dysfunction"
Author(s) -
Qiang Wei,
Dehong Cao,
Liangren Liu
Publication year - 2014
Publication title -
asian journal of andrology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.701
H-Index - 74
eISSN - 1745-7262
pISSN - 1008-682X
DOI - 10.4103/1008-682x.148069
Subject(s) - medicine , erectile dysfunction , dosing , adverse effect , randomized controlled trial , incidence (geometry) , nausea , diabetes mellitus , clinical trial , anesthesia , endocrinology , optics , physics
to AEs was 3.6%. Zhao et al.4 performed a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, controlled trial to evaluate the efficacy and safety of once-daily dosing of udenafil in the treatment of ED. They found the incidence of AEs using udenafil 50 mg once-daily for ED patients was 10%. There are some differences in incidence rates of AEs among the studies.2–6 Thus, we believe that the AEs rate may be an important parameter to assess the drug safety. Meanwhile, we consider it is better to report the rate and classify of AEs contributed to objectively and fairly evaluate the safety between 50 mg once-daily and 200 mg on-demand dosing use of udenafil for the treatment of type 2 diabetic patients with ED, although most studies indicated AEs of udenafil for ED were safe.5,6

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom