Research reorientation

In several situations, the newer implications abutted to replace the historic thinking and practice but in fewer incidences, it challenged the fundamental science. Many newer perceptions have questioned essentials. The views hurled when evidence based, and research documents blurred on the fundamental theories and clinical steps followed over the years. The older measures are replaced by newer understanding materials, it enhanced the science and the basics challenged, it remained a test for fundamental science. When the established thoughts were proven wrong, it raised qualms on the earlier study protocol. This happened to be alarming, or it can also opined that perception of misunderstanding. The solutions can be obtained by following more qualitative research with a definitive protocol. It becomes essential to develop and achieve the outcome with more justifiable contributions than quantitative fact. This direction will differentiate our research positioning and establishing prosthodontics science.