English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

the medical and humane aspects of healthcare delivery. Peer review, on the other hand, while being relatively more subjective than formal accreditation, takes a more holistic view of patient care and their outcomes from a fellow clinician’s perspective. Medical peer review should, however, instill trust by being fair and transparent, failing which it may be taken over by nonmedical teams, which would be detrimental both to the public and profession.[5]

Institutional external peer review: A unique National Cancer Grid initiative