English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

The aim of this study was to analyse and compare the inferential comprehension strategies used by a language-learning disabled and non-language-learning disabled subject, as well as to investigate their performance in areas related to inferential comprehension. For these purposes, tests were either constructed or modified in order to allow for qualitative analysis of the subjects' responses and the strategies used. The non-language-learning disabled subject was found to utilize efficient inferential strategies, suggestive of cognitive-linguistic integrity, whereas the language-learning disabled subject was found to use inefficient inferential strategies and to be deficient in several areas related to inferential comprehension. These findings are interpreted as being reflective of a breakdown in the interactional dynamics between cognition and language.

A comparative study inferential comprehension strategies between a language-learning disabled and non language-learning disabled child