English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

In this article certain presuppositions of the innateness hypothesis of the TGG are judged by comparing it to aspects from the philosophy of Dooyeweerd. It is indicated that: (i) the TGG as well as Dooyeweerd postulates a radical structural distinction between man and animal but on different grounds; (ii) the intertwined unity of human nature is not fully recognised by the TGG; (iii) the complementary role o f man and reality in determining the structure of knowledge is acknowledged by both the TGG and Dooyeweerd. On these grounds it is stated that the TGG can not uncritically be accommodated into Dooyeweerd's philosophical framework

Die ingeborenheid-hipotese van die TGG en Dooyeweerd se filosofie