English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

<strong>The Confession of Belhar and ecumenism against the  backdrop of the Three Forms of Unity</strong>  This article focuses on  the  Confession of Belhar and in- vestigates from an ecclesiastical and theological perspective  the question whether this confession should be accepted and  added as a fourth confession to the existing Three Forms of  Unity. The following aspects are addressed: the origin and  content of the Confession  of Belhar, the ecclesiastical and  theological reaction within the family of Dutch Reformed  Churches as well as in the reformed ecumenical world. A critical  analysis of the content is made and evaluated, and in con- clusion attention is given to a few options with regard to the  place of the Confession of Belhar in the reformed ecumenical  world in the future. A comparison between the Three Forms of  Unity and the Confession of Belhar shows a definite difference  in quality. The Confession of Belhar is not of a similar standard  with regard to the theological and doctrinal content and  structure of the Three Forms of Unity, and does not add quality  or neglected faith-related value to these existing creeds

Die Belydenis van Belhar en die ekumene teen die agtergrond van die Drie Formuliere van Eenheid