English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

<strong>Response to <em>The death of the author and the inspiration of the  Bible: in discussion with P.J. Nel and S.D. Snyman</em></strong>  This contribution is a  response to an article  that enters into a  debate with an earlier article by the present author published in  2003, where it was argued that current theories on the  inspiration of the Bible can no longer be maintained due to our  knowledge of the origin of especially the Old Testament. In this  response it is argued that  the arguments put forward as a  critique of the earlier article are not convincing. Arguments  against current theories of the inspiration of the Bible are taken  note of, but they are not countered for. Furthermore, some of  the arguments are simply ignored. The status quo seems to be  the answer proposed

Respons op Die dood van die outeur en die inspirasie van die Bybel: in gesprek met P.J. Nel en S.D. Snyman