English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Difficult tracheal intubation is the most common factor related to serious airway complications during anesthesia [1]. Difficult tracheal intubation is defined as insertion of the endotracheal tube using direct laryngoscopy that requires more than two attempts lasting more than 10 min each or that requires an alternative technique [2]. The difficult airway involves interactions among patient factors, the clinical setting, and the practitioneru0027s skills [3]. Many alternative tools and techniques have been developed to facilitate intubation in cases of difficult direct laryngoscopy. Among these, videolaryngoscopy (VL) improves glottis visualization using either an optical or video system, which allows communication between the operator and assistants and facilitates teaching; this method is gaining popularity [4]. Recently, VL has begun to be considered as a first-line tool for airway management, rather than as a rescue tool for difficult intubation [3,5,6]. However, VL does not achieve a 100% intubation success rate, and complications have been associated with the procedure [5,7,8]. With VL, the success of intubation lies not in the view obtained, but in the ease of inserting the endotracheal tube. Instead of the Cormack-Lehane scoring system, Swann et al. [9] proposed the Fremantle score, calculated using a three-part scoring system based on the laryngeal view (full, partial, or no view), ease of endotracheal intubation (easy, modified, or unachievable), and device used. The Korean Society of Anesthesiologists should consider the use of this new scoring system and various tools for cases of difficult intubation.In this issue of the Korean Journal of Anesthesiology, Shim et al. [10] compared GlideScope® and McGrath® laryngoscopes in simulated cases of difficult intubation. They used a four-grade videoscopic view. However, they did not precisely describe the grade. In addition, a tube exchanger and vascular forceps were used instead of a rigid stylet, which can be associated with complications [8]. Although a difficult airway was simulated with an extrication collar, actual patients with difficult airways were excluded. In the simulation, the first-attempt success rates were 82.8% (GlideScope® group) and 83.8% (McGrath® group).Failed intubation with the GlideScope® was also reported in this issue of the Korean Journal of Anesthesiology [11]. There was resistance to passage of the endotracheal tube into the larynx with a conventional laryngoscope. The GlideScope® then revealed that a septum divided the subglottic area into two sections. A laryngeal mask did not provide adequate ventilation due to laryngeal edema caused by multiple intubation attempts, and the surgery was postponed. In this case, the patient failed to recall any previous difficulties with anesthesia. The preanesthetic history, chest radiography, and spirometry failed to reveal the patientu0027s tracheal stenosis under the vocal cords. The difficulty grade of direct laryngoscopy was not described; passing the endotracheal tube was impossible due to the unusual trachea. A full view of the larynx was obtained using direct laryngoscopy and the GlideScope®.Considering these two articles, we need to keep in mind that neither the use of VL nor achievement of a laryngeal view guarantees intubation success. Accurately predicting a difficult airway remains as a cornerstone of airway management. Furthermore, considering the recognized associations between a difficult airway and patient characteristics, the patientu0027s medical history may help to predict a difficult airway [3,12]. To avoid airway complications, anesthesiologists should be proficient in the use of a wide range of anesthetic airway techniques and alternative intubation tools and should know how to manage a failed airway, including when and how they will wake the patient in cases of difficulty [1]. In addition, for follow-up care, the anesthesiologist should inform the patient of the airway difficulty that was encountered. A written report that describes the difficult airway, including the apparent reasons for difficulty, how the intubation was finally accomplished, and the implications for future care, is recommended [3].In conclusion, anesthesiologists should determine a strategy for a difficult intubation. They should assemble a team that can assist one another and make prompt decisions, use the most familiar and skilled tool, and record the findings in detail.

A good laryngeal view does not guarantee perfectly successful tracheal intubation