English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

BACKGROUND: This prospective investigation assessed success rates of a pain management program for patients with and without DSM-III-R Axis I and II psychiatric disorders. METHOD: Subjects included 40 consecutive patients with chronic pain who were referred to a physical therapy-oriented, "standard" pain management program. Serial ratings of pain levels were measured via a visual analogue scale (VAS) at baseline, weekly throughout a 12-week program, and during a follow-up interval 1 month after completion of the program. Weekly reports of hours of gainful employment were recorded. VAS scores and number of hours worked per week were combined into a measure of pain improvement. This dependent variable was used to compare groups of patients across psychiatric disorders diagnosed via the Diagnostic Interview Schedule (DIS). Percentages of patients in each diagnostic group who met minimal criteria for improvement were computed and compared. A chi-square analysis was conducted on success rates between patients with and without any Axis I disorder, any Axis II disorder, and any substance abuse/dependence disorder. RESULTS: Overall, 70% of patients (N = 28) were found to have a DIS psychiatric disorder. There were differences in improvement between patients with and without Axis I disorders and between those with and without Axis II disorders. The presence of a diagnosis was associated with significantly lower improvement rates (p &lt;.05). CONCLUSION: Patients with chronic pain enrolled in this clinic had a high prevalence of comorbid psychiatric disorders, and these comorbid patients were less likely to improve with standard chronic pain treatment. In a population of patients seeking treatment for chronic pain, these results suggest a need for detection and diagnosis of psychiatric disorders and further research on the efficacy of psychiatric treatment interventions in chronic pain management.

Comorbid Psychiatric Disorders and Predictors of Pain Management Program Success in Patients With Chronic Pain