English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

espanolEste estudio tiene por objetivo central comparar los marcos normativos vigentes que regulan la migracion en Canada y Argentina con el proposito de identificar en ellos lascondiciones que inciden, ya sea para restringir o bien para retrasar el acceso a derechos. Para ello se compararon los cuerpos legales de ambos paises en relacion a sus fundamentos declarados, las condiciones para el acceso a los derechos, el transito entre categorias migratorias y la heterogeneidad de las mismas. Nuestra hipotesis de trabajo asume que los marcos normativos y los sistemas de visado/residencia mas complejos, vale decir, aquellos que buscan sobrerregular las trayectorias de los migrantes, inciden en la creacion de mas alternativas para el retroceso en el acceso a los derechos, para la prolongacion de la temporalidad y la eventual caida en la irregularidad. La pregunta que oriento este estudio busco establecer que consecuencias han traido para el acceso a los derechos de los migrantes los sistemas de visado/residencia vigentes en la institucionalidad migratoria de Argentina y Canada. EnglishThe objective of this study is to compare the existing regulatory frameworks migration in Canada and Argentina, with the purpose of identifying the conditions that affect access to or delaying access to rights. To this end, the legal frameworks of those countries were compared in relation to their principles, the conditions for access to rights, the restrictions between migratory categories and their heterogeneity. Our working hypothesis assumes that the more complex visa/residence systems are, the higher the impact on the production of alternatives for the retrogression in the access to rights, the prolongation of thetemporality, and the eventual fall in the irregularity. In this sense, the question that leads this study seeks to establish what consequences have been brought to the access to therights of migrants, the visa/residence systems in the migratory frameworks of Argentina and Canada. In methodological terms, the production of information was based on the systematization of the regulations in the two countries and their analysis based on the evaluations carried out by the specialized literature in both. It was addressed with content analysis. Key informants were also interviewed to triangulate the results and sources.

Estatus legal precario y condicionalidad en el acceso a derechos: Una aproximación a la regulación migratoria de Argentina y Canadá