English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

This paper exposes and analyses the different legal perspectives of the decisions of the ordinary jurisdiction (Courts of Appeals and Supreme Court of Justice), the decisions of the public administration (Comptroller General of the Republic) and the constitutional jurisdiction (Constitutional Court and Supreme Court) regarding the application of the (Municipal patents) to passive investment companies, highlighting the elements of disagreement between the different administrative and judicial bodies competent for their solution, as the result that is crystallized in the current state of the matter. The author emphasizes how the decisions of the public bodies involved have become uniform, notwithstanding that the law seems to allow different possible solutions to the same type of cases.

revista de derecho

Coordinación y controversia entre órganos encargados de resolver sobre disputas tributarias en materia de patentes municipales: Contraloría General de la República, Cortes de apelaciones, Corte Suprema y Tribunal Constitucional.