English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

espanolRESUMEN: La ley chilena ha sido favorable al arbitraje como un mecanismo de resolucion de conflictos. Ese apoyo fue extendido al arbitraje internacional mediante la Ley 19.971 y, en particular, con la clara parcialidad a favor de la ejecucion de laudos extranjeros. Sin embargo, las decisiones judiciales se mantienen ancladas en requisitos y analisis que son inconsistentes con la Ley 19.971 y con los tratados internacionales aplicables, lo cual puede afectar el perfil pro arbitraje de Chile. EnglishABSTRACT: Chilean law has been supportive of arbitration as a dispute resolution mechanism. Law No. 19,971 of 2004 extended such support to international arbitration and introduced a clear pro-enforcement bias in favour of foreign arbitral awards. However, court decisions remain rooted in requirements and analysis that are inconsistent with Law No. 19,971 of 2004 and applicable international treaties, which may affect the Chilean pro-arbitration profile.

ANALYSIS OF CHILEAN CASE LAW ON THE RECOGNITION AND ENFORCEMENT OF FOREIGNARBITRAL AWARDS