English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

espanolRESUMEN: Generalmente, la cuestion de la procedencia del dano moral en materia contractual es intensamente debatida. El problema ya no es si procede o no, sino, mas bien, bajo que condiciones deberia proceder. Este trabajo intenta presentar y examinar criticamente un grupo de sentencias de la Corte Suprema dictadas entre los anos 2005 y 2016 y proponer ciertos dispositivos para enfrentar lo que aqui se ha denominado una “respuesta liberal” por parte de la Corte. EnglishABSTRACT: Non-pecuniary damages in contract law are anywhere a strongly debated issue. The problem is not anymore that these kinds of damages are forbidden but the conditions under which they should be available. This work intends to present and, to some extent, critically examine some decisions of the Supreme Court on this topic issued from 2005 to 2016 and proposes some devices to face what is called here a “liberal answer” of the Supreme Court.

EL DAÑO MORAL EN MATERIA CONTRACTUAL: LA MIRADA DE LA CORTE SUPREMA