English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

The author proposes that the reasons developed by the Inter-American Court of Human Rights to reject requests of advisory opinions seek to preserve the subsidiary character of the regional system of human rights. However, the article shows recent cases in which the Court has not been completely consistent with its own previous decisions on this matter.

CAUSALES DE INADMISIBILIDAD DE OPINIONES CONSULTIVAS: REFORZANDO EL CARÁCTER SUBSIDIARIO DEL SISTEMA INTERAMERICANO DE DERECHOS HUMANOS