English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

espanolLa Ley n° 20.480 de diciembre de 2010 introdujo en el articulo 10 n° 11 del Codigo penal chileno una nueva forma de estado de necesidad. En el seno del debate cientifico nacional sobre su merito o demerito tecnico, esta innovacion legislativa tambien ha reactivado la discusion sobre la naturaleza juridica de la norma, esto es, si tiene un caracter bimembre - excluyendo, segun las particularidades del caso, la antijuridicidad o la culpabilidad- o si solo rige como una causa de exculpacion. A un lustro de la entrada en vigor de la norma, esta contribucion contiene un repaso de la discusion local que ha suscitado, una serie de reservas o matices a la linea argumental de ambas posiciones, y, tras advertir los obstaculos que la disposicion impone al interprete, una defensa de la tesis de su caracter exclusivamente exculpante. Por ultimo, se incluye la descripcion y critica de la postura que sobre el argumento ha suscrito recientemente un autor nacional. EnglishLaw no. 29480 of December 2010 has introduced into Article 10 no. 11 of the Chilean Penal Code a new form of necessity defense. In the context of the national scientific debate concerning the merits and demerits of the Reform, this amendment has revived the discussion on the legal nature of necessity: that is, if such defense is an excuse or if instead it has a dual structure, thus being both a justification and an excuse, depending on the relevant case. Five years after this provision has entered into force, this essay portrays the debate the rose among Chilean Scholarship on the Reform. It then provides the author's interpretation and/or posture on both theories, and also points out the difficulties related to the interpretation of necessity as an excuse, which the author considers to be the only convincing conclusion. In the end, it describes and critically analyses the opinion recently put forth by a national scholar on this issue.

El estado de necesidad del artículo 10 n° 11 del Código penal chileno: ¿Una norma bifronte? Elementos para una respuesta negativa