English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

espanolCon la presente investigacion se pretende: (i) delimitar el significado, alcance y los criterios de imputacion objetiva; (ii) establecer los ambitos de competencia o las tareas que le corresponde realizar tanto a la causalidad como la imputacion objetiva; y (iii) dar un fundamento filosofico que soporte la exigencia de ambos niveles como elementos necesarios para determinar la responsabilidad penal de un individuo, demostrandose a partir de ello, como tesis principales, que la causalidad y la imputacion objetiva cumplen funciones diferentes y necesarias, pues uno es el conector empirico de la realidad naturalistica en la que se basa la accion y el resultado; y el otro es el conector normativo. El primero (la causalidad) brinda la materia prima empirica que sera analizada y valorada por la segunda para saber si le ha de pertenecer o no a una persona; para saber si, objetivamente (o mejor normativamente) puede serle finalmente atribuida. La segunda, en cambio, valora lo que la primera describe. Asi pues, sera puesto de presente que, desde este punto de vista, la imputacion objetiva termina siendo un elemento juridicamente valorativo y prescriptivo, mientras que la causalidad tan solo meramente descriptiva. EnglishWith the following investigation, the intention is to: (i) delimit the meaning, reaches and the criteria of objective imputation; (ii) establish the areas of competences or the tasks that are developed either by the causality or the objective imputation; and (iii) give a philosophical foundation that support the exigences of both levels as necessary elements to determine the criminal liabilty o fan individual, demostrating from it, as main thesis, that the causality and the objective imputation carried out different and necessary functions because one is the empirical link of the naturalistic reality in which the action and the result is based on; and the other one is the normative link. The first ( the causality) gives the empirical raw materials that will be analyzed and valued by the second one in order to know if it belongs or not to a person; in order to know, as well, if it is objectively ( or better normatively) finally attributed. The second one, on the other hand, values what the first describes. In this way, it will be taken into account, from this point of view that the objective imputation ends up being a juridically valorative and prescriptive, while causality does only in a descriptive way.

La necesidad del análisis causal frente a la teoría de la imputación objetiva en el derecho penal