English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Free Plan

This paper analyses the justification of the normative premise in judicial decisions applied to preventive detention and examines some frequent criticisms. For this purpose, it firstly reconstructs the dominant doctrinal conception of preventive detention, which some refer to as ‘precautionary conception’. Further, it shows that the normative premises on which judges base their decisions embrace this doctrinal conception, which is confirmed in a number of procedural arrangements that in many other aspects are very heterogeneous. Subsequently, it presents some doctrinal criticisms that claim the illegitimacy of this conception of preventive detention.

Acerca de la justificación de la prisión preventiva y algunas críticas frecuentes