English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

There are two ways for homo economicus to make a living. He can produce useful goods and services for exchange with other producers –the way of production and exchange– and/or he can try to appropriate a larger slice of whatever others produce –the way of appropriation and conflict. Until the 1960s, economics was almost exclusively centered on analyzing production and exchange for which it was enough to focus only on the bright side of homo economicus, that is, on his propensity to exchange for what he wants. Since then, interest in analyzing appropriation and conflict has been increasing, exposing his dark side –that is, his inclination to grab what he wants. More recently, a synthesis of both analyses has been driving the research on the governance of private and public transactions as well as the growing consensus that almost all transactions need governance (in the sense of a restraining influence over the parties to transactions). Although much remains to be done, a meaningful analysis of governance assumes the dark side of self-interest and deals explicitly with the costs of appropriation and conflict. This section contains three papers that illustrate progress in the economic analysis of appropriation and conflict. First, Herschel Grossman looks at recurring distributional disputes between social groups to determine the conditions for their settlement through a self-enforcing constitution or for them to become neverending civil conflicts. Second, Andres Solimano discusses the threat of huge losses due to civil conflict and terrorism with special reference to Latin America. Given the limits to preventing the losses, Solimano looks at the complementarities between private and public insurance to share them. Finally, Edgardo Barandiaran high-lights the relevance of Aoki’s comparative analysis to explain the institutional arrangements to protect property from autocrats (Olson’s stationary bandits) and their implications for the emergence of the democratic state. Cuadernos de Economia, Ano 40, No 121, pp. 607 (diciembre 2003)

THE TWO SIDES OF THE FORCE: ECONOMIC ANALYSIS OF PRODUCTION AND APPROPRIATION