English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

espanolAlgo particular de los estudios de la ciencia, tecnologia y sociedad (CTS) son sus formas de relacionar objetos y practicas. La relacion difiere del papel que tiene en la sociologia de la ciencia y en la construccion social de la tecnologia. Suele afirmarse en CTS, contradiciendo conocimientos humanistas, que la naturaleza de los actores sociales no estaria definida por adelantado. Asumir lo semiotico como algo excepcional del sujeto humano, donde los objetos solo acreditan sus agencias a traves de procesos simbolicos, seria perder de vista la riqueza empirica de las practicas colectivas que articulan lo humano y lo no-humano. En cambio, sujetos y objetos suelen pensarse en CTS como efectos sociomateriales reconfigurables de relaciones in situ. La figura del actor-red, la lectura situada de actores material-semioticos, el estudio de objetos frontera y el uso de metodos de ensamblaje son algunas de los virajes en este giro de la teoria de la accion. Aqui voy a delinear un recorrido parcial a traves de sus argumentos, introduciendo el debate sobre las divisiones entre naturaleza y cultura, para examinar la nocion de agencia con los conceptos de traduccion, configuracion, multiplicidad y no-coherencia. A modo de ejemplo, termino con una lectura sobre la socialidad y espacialidad de los cajeros automaticos. EnglishStudies of science, technology and society (STS) are characteristics in relating objects and practices. The relationship differs from the role it has in the sociology of science and in the social construction of technology. It is usually affirmed in STS, contradicting humanities, that the nature of the social actors would not be defined in advance. Considering that the semiotic is something exceptional of the human subject, where objects only accredit their agencies through symbolic processes, would be to lose sight of the empirical richness of collective practices that articulate the human and the non-human. Instead, subjects and objects are often thought of in STS as reconfigurable sociomaterial effects of in situ relationships. The figure of the actor-network, the situated reading of material-semiotic actors, the study of boundary objects and the use of assembly methods are some of the conceptual turns in this variation of action theory. Here I will delineate a partial route to travel through its arguments, introducing the debate on the divisions of nature and culture, to examine the notion of agency with the concepts of translation, configuration, multiplicity and non-coherence. As an example, I finish with a reading on the sociality and spatiality of ATMs.

Actores, objetos, figuras: el giro sociomaterial en la teoría de la acción