English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

One of the most controversial aspects of the debate on urban sustainability is to what extent the overall environmental impact of cities is determined by their shape and spatial structure. Compact City Approach defenders argue that people living in the densest and central areas of large cities have low environmental impact. Residential density and distance to the Central Business District (CBD) are the most common indicators proposed to capture urban spatial structure of cities. In this paper we estimate the carbon footprint of residential energy consumption, commuting and leisure purposes mobility from 475 surveys conducted in Concepcion Metropolitan Area (Chile). After controlling for potential endogeneity problems and taken into account the socioeconomic aspects that may affect the value of the carbon footprint, residential density does not exercise significant influence, so compactness policies could prove ineffective. The results rule out that this result is due to the existence of compensatory behaviors that lead to abnormally high mobility for leisure purposes in denser areas. Income is the main element explaining the observed variability in footprint values.

Forma urbana y Huella Ecológica en el Área Metropolitana de Concepción (Chile)