English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

The aim was to evaluate the concordance between measurements of VO2max obtained by exercise cardiopulmonary test (gold-standard) vs. that obtained by predictive equations. Men (21-55 years-old) were grouped into Resistance training (RT; n=31), long-distance runners (R; n=28) and non-exercise practitioners (C; n=35). Five equations were tested, one of them made from Brazilian sample. The concordance was evaluated by Bland-Altman, and correlation analysis by Pearson's coefficient (r). The r between gold-standard vs. equations ranged 0.27 to 0.75, with p 40 mL.kg-1.min-1. In conclusion, the predictive equations tested generate low concordance when compared to VO2maxgold-standard test, mainly for VO2max>40 mL.kg-1.min-1.

VO2max estimado por equações preditivas apresenta baixa concordância com o obtido pelo padrão ouro - teste cardiopulmonar.