English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Nove cultivares de trigo, sob condições de fertilidade do solo - sem alumínio trocável e sem adubo (I), com alumínio trocável e sem adubo (II), sem alumínio trocável e adubação (III) com 250 kg ha-1 da fórmula 4-20-20 foram avaliadas na safra 2001/2002 em relação à estatura de plantas, peso do hectolitro e rendimento. Os resultados foram comparados pelo teste de Tukey a 5% de significância, concluindo-se que os tratamentos interferiram nos parâmetros avaliados. No tratamento I, apresentou desempenho melhor a cultivar BRS 49. No tratamento II, apresentou melhor desempenho a cultivar IAPAR 53 e no tratamento III, apresentou melhor desempenho a cultivar CD 105. A cultivar OR 1, porém, não apresentou desempenho satisfatório, apresentando menor rendimento em todos os tratamentos. O tratamento II apresentou maior rendimento que o I, justificado, possivelmente, pelo alto teor de matéria orgânica que, em determinadas situações, consegue complexar o alumínio. O rendimento médio foi mais elevado no tratamento III.Nine wheat cultivars were carried out under three different soil fertility conditions, without exchangeable aluminum nor fertilizer (I), with exchangeable aluminum but without fertilizer (II), and without exchangeable aluminum plus 250 kg ha-1 of 4-20-20 fertilizer formula (III) for 2001/2002 harvest. Plants' height, hectolitric weight and productivity were recorded. Significant differences were observed at 5% using the Tukey test, concluding that fertility treatments interfered on the evaluated parameters. For the first treatment, BRS 49 cultivar was recommended. For treatment II, IAPAR 53 cultivar presented better performance. As for the third treatment, CD 105 cultivar was recommended. OR 1 cultivar, on the other hand, was not recommended, since it presented the lowest productivity. Finally, results showed that treatment II presented better productivity than treatment I, probably because of its great percentage of organic matter, which, sometimes, can inhibit aluminum. Average productivity was recorded as the highest in treatment III

Resposta de cultivares de trigo (<em>Triticum aestivum</em> L.) a teores de alumínio no solo