English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Free Plan

To compare the pulpal responses to light-cured and self-cured resin cements, cervical cavities were prepared in monkey's teeth, followed by application of etching gel and adhesive (Single Bond). A dual-cure resin cement (RelyX ARC) was applied, and hybrid composite inlays (Estenia) were bonded to the cavities. In one group, the cavities were photoirradiated for 20 seconds and the resin cement light-cured. In the other group, the resin cement was self-cured for six minutes without any photoirradiation. After experimental periods of seven, 28, and 70 days, histological features of pulp tissue were evaluated and compared. Results showed no significant differences in the histological features of the pulp tissues between the two curing methods. Both light-cured and self-cured resin cements showed acceptable biological compatibility with the monkey pulp. No bacterial penetration along the cavity walls was detected with either curing method.

Effect of Curing Method of a Dual-cure Resin Cement on Monkey Pulpal Reaction after Bonding of Tooth-colored Inlay