English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Within the history of political thought in twentieth-century China, critical literature on The Social Contract has thrived during two periods. At the turn of the century, intellectuals mainly debated Rousseau’s apriorism and the utopian view of his book. Intellectuals from the last two decades of the century focused on the book’s consequences on political practice and on its intrinsic link to totalitarianism. However, they failed to emphasize that the totalitarian regime of a single party is by definition contrary to the Rousseauist conception of “popular sovereignty” and of a Republic ruled by law.

Remarques sur les critiques chinoises du Contrat social