English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Kevin Elliott’s book, A Tapestry of Values, is not just (as the subtitle suggests) An Introduction to Values in Science, but an excellent one.1 Elliott builds an engaging and comprehensive account of the need for careful consideration of values in all of the core phases of scientific inquiry, and he builds it around a rich collection of interesting and thickly described cases and examples of values playing both legitimate and illegitimate roles in science. By engaging closely with cases across a wide variety of different sciences, in different contexts, Elliott makes a compelling case that the need for values in science is widespread. Out of his discussion, two primary normative reasons for the value-ladenness of science emerge, one based on choices and the other based on aims. Three conditions for the legitimate use of values in science are also proposed—transparency, representation, and engagement—each of which, as norms for values in science, have much to recommend them. These unifying themes emerge again and again from the examples.

Weaving Value Judgment into the Tapestry of Science