English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

This study aims to present the ABET-CAC accreditation framework and discusses how to manage program’s constituencies of an academic program in higher education. It describes the program’s associated entities and the methods of creating required evidence for the program accreditation in computer science education. It follows a mixed method to evaluate and measure the program performance. It discusses the program’s performance measurement methods and its analysis. It emphasizes the program’s entities such as students learning outcomes, course assessment and performance evaluation. It shows a scientific approach that measures the program’s performance. It suggests the evidence should be considered as important indicators for both when planning the quality improvement for the program delivery and program’s benchmarking. For any program accreditation in computing education, the framework needs to be followed at least for two years to ease the program’s review process. This will help prepare competently for the accreditation, ahead of program’s review visit by the commission.

Evaluation of an Academic Program: The Case of Computing Accreditation Commission Framework in Higher Education