English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

The present article has two complementary parts. In the first part we offer a philological analysis of Yefet b. Eli’s translation of Daniel 1:20 in comparison with Sa adyah’s version and the oldest Christian Arabic translation (Sin. ar. 1) which has survived. In the second part, we analyse Yefet b. Eli’s commentary focusing on its periphery (not in the heart of the Biblical exegesis in itself) thereby showing how the Karaite author carried out an attack against the official intelligentsia of those days. For this, the author makes use of the scene narrated in the Danielic text to represent the scene of a maǧlis in which the debate is chaired by the monarch. This debate is held, with the king’s wise men, the official intelligentsia, i.e. the Rabbanite thinkers, on the one hand and, on the other hand, the non-offical thinkers, the Karaites, who represent the superior knowledge and the truth which emanates from the Law revealed by God. The Rabbanites represent Nebuchadnezzar’s wise men of Daniel’s text, and the Karaites are Daniel and the young Jews, who are superior to them in science and perfection.

sefarad

En la periferia de un texto judeoárabe: Yefet b. ͑Eli contra filósofos y astrólogos, entre &lt;i&gt;tafsīr&lt;/i&gt; y realidad figurada (precedido de unas notas filológicas)