English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Free Plan

The condition of dependence, inherent to all human being, has been regulated politically and institutionally on the basis of a series of assumptions which articulate a gender construction of care. These a priori’s could be subject to an overhaul due to the implementation of political initiatives, such as the Dependency Act as it could induce to a socialization of moral duties with regard to dependency, a visibility of competences and skills required for care and a review of the “gender” of work. This article debates, from a gender perspective, the potential of this Act and its contribution to the fight for giving a meaning to care. This analysis is based on field work, consisting of 20 in-depth interviews with key persons, with the view to study the semantic battles between the various players which participated in the elaboration of the Act.

Crisis de los cuidados, Ley de Dependencia y confusión semántica