English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

In this article I analyze the progressive development of a number of ideas in Spanish language texts, from the middle of the XVIth Century on, that consolidated in Spain a deeply negative notion of the grammarian as it had been defended by the firsts humanists: as a specialist capable of doing high-level contributions in fields such as Law, Medicine or interpretation of the Scriptures. Since Huarte de San Juan’s Examen de ingenios or Pineda’s Dialogos familiares, until the texts written by Quevedo and Suarez de Figueroa at the beginning of the XVIIth Century, many Spanish intellectuals insisted on the grammarians’ alleged pedantry, ignorance, lack of moral authority or even heresy, in order to discredit every possible intent to applying the science of language to the other disciplines considered more serious or important.

Reprobación y sátira del <em>gramático</em> en las letras áureas. I. Diálogos y tratados, fines del siglo XVI