English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

espanolEste trabajo profundiza la configuracion tipologica del milagro XXI de Berceo a traves del analisis de algunos elementos agregados respecto de la fuente latina que no fueron senalados por Boreland (1983) y que, sin embargo, acentuan la construccion de la Abadesa como “postfigura” o tipo (invertido e imperfecto) de Maria. Sostendremos tambien que Berceo construye la escena de la aparicion y milagro mariano en relacion estrecha a las escenas de la anunciacion y la natividad, sirviendose no solo de la Vulgata, sino de una serie de motivos presentes en los Apocrifos de la natividad. EnglishIn this study we will inquire into the typological configuration of Berceo’s twentieth first miracle. We will analyse some added elements which are lacking in the Latin source and that have not been noticed by Boreland (1983). Such elements contribute to the configuration of the Abbess as a “postfigure” or as an inverted and imperfect type of Mary. Furthermore, we will argue that Berceo constructs the scene of the Marian apparition and miracle in close relation with the annunciation and nativity by using not only the Vulgate but also a series of motifs drawn from the apocryphal nativity tradition.

La configuración tipológica de “La abadesa preñada” de Berceo y su relación con la tradición apócrifa