English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

The aim of this work is to undertake the first comparative analysis of the electoral practices in the campaign of Buenos Aires from the establishment of the law of «broad» suffrage in 1821 up to and including Rosism, from the study of differentiated political jurisdictions such as the «partido» (minimum political jurisdiction) of Quilmes and Azul-Tapalque, distanced both geographically and historically. Through correspondence, minutes of meetings and electoral lists, etc., we contrast electoral behaviors related to socio-demographic, economic and cultural aspects, stressing the importance of the middle and subordinate sectors and of the negotiation and consensus during the process.

Consagrando a los ciudadanos. Procesos electorales comparados en la campaña de Buenos Aires durante la primera mitad del siglo XIX