English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

La evaluaci??n de la actividad investigadora en Espa??a mediante la ???acreditaci??n nacional??? y los ???sexenios de \udinvestigaci??n???, no solo otorga reconocimiento personal y social a profesores e investigadores sino que condiciona su carrera \udacad??mica, de ah?? que se trate de un asunto pol??mico. Las cr??ticas m??s contundentes se centran en las revistas cient??ficas \udy la forma de evaluarlas, siendo las revistas universitarias las que se sienten especialmente perjudicadas frente a otros \udcolectivos. Se explora la situaci??n de las revistas universitarias espa??olas en relaci??n con los criterios de evaluaci??n de \udlas agencias mediante distintos indicadores: regularidad, periodicidad, peer review, presencia en ??ndices de impacto y \udsituaci??n en los sistemas de valoraci??n. Los resultados detectan deficiencias importantes y la comparaci??n entre revistas \uduniversitarias y no universitarias, aunque permite identificar diferencias, estas no son muy acusadas. Las conclusiones \udpueden ser de inter??s para que las agencias de evaluaci??n rectifiquen los criterios que directa o indirectamente penalizan \udla edici??n universitaria.The evaluation of scientific performance in Spain through the ???national accreditation??? system and the sexennials \ud(a research assessment program that evaluates academic staff every six years) does not only confer social and personal \udrecognition to professors and researchers, but it also has an influence over their future academic careers. This is a \udcontroversial issue where the greatest criticism centers on academic journals and how they are evaluated. Within academic \udjournals, university journals are those considered to be the most disadvantaged. In this article we explore the state \udof Spanish academic journals from the perspective of how evaluation criteria are applied by different agencies, using \udseveral indicators: regularity, periodicity, peer review, their presence in journal impact indexes, and their position in various \udjournal assessment systems. Our results have detected significant deficiencies, but although there are some differences \udwhen comparing university and non-university journals, they are not significant. These conclusions can be of interest for \udevaluation agencies in order to consider rectifying criteria that currently penalize university publishing directly or indirectly

Las revistas universitarias en el marco de los criterios de evaluación de la actividad investigadora en España