English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Free Plan

This paper analyzes certain controversies that biopolitical interpretations of Hannah Arendt’s thought may arise. Recently, several scholars have emphasized that new theoretical clues are made possible through a link between some Arendtian key-concepts («Natality», «Freedom», «Power», «Life») and the biopolitical paradigm. Nevertheless, their studies do not consider enough the original Arendtian background: Phenomenology. Then, it could cause her thought can be misleading. The following steps are required to prove this point: a) to evaluate the viability of the biopolitical interpretations of Arendt’s thought; b) to determine their scope; c) to show their risk of producing a misrepresentation of her thought. If this risk can be shown, then the explanating power of the biopolitical paradigm could be considerably relativized.

Vida, natalidad y libertad en Hannah Arendt: Objeciones a ciertas lecturas biopolíticas del pensamiento arendtiano