English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Three Latin texts were, according to many scholars, not written by their alleged authors, namely Hor., Sat. I 10.1-8, Verg., Aen. II 567-588 and Ou., Am. III 5. They are, however, still published as authentic, unless in exceptional cases. This paper pays attention to the reasons why they have been treated as falsely ascribed. It also delves into certain some aspects, previously not well taken into account, that may help to confirm, with a variable degree of certainty, the authenticity of these texts, in particular, the role of the author as publisher of his works

emérita/emerita

Hor., &lt;em&gt;Sat&lt;/em&gt;. I 10.1-8, Verg., &lt;em&gt;Aen&lt;/em&gt;. II 567-588 y Ou., &lt;em&gt;Am&lt;/em&gt;. III 5: el papel del autor como editor