English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

The authenticity of Heraclitus‘ fragment B 44 can be doubted on account of the following reasons: 1. stylistic and syntactic anomalies (problematical articles, a strange looking insertion of ὑπὲρ τοῦ γινομένου); 2. a similarity between B 44 and B 115 (duplication of the same metaphor); 3. an incongruity between the message of B 44 and Heraclitus' views; 4. anachronistic meaning of the term νόμος which could not refer to a law in Heraclitus' lifetime; 5. an analogy with trivial gnomic wisdom; 6. an analogy with Heraclitean falsa in a moralistic spirit; 7. a connection of B 44 with B 43 that are not found anywhere else. These objections do not exclude the authenticity of the fragment, but its defenders should neutralize them with some strong arguments

Heraclitus, DK 22 B 44 (frg. 103, Marcovich)