English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

The author exposes again his theory, which considers Etruscan as a derivative of the most ancient Indoeuropean, preserved in some Anatolian languages. He studies this problem from a linguistic point of view: sg. = Pl., N. = Ac., N. = G., nominal, adjectival and verbal (monothematic) flexion of an archaic IE type, comparing Etruscan with the pre-brugmannian, archaic Indoeuropean. He maintains his opinion that the Etruscans arived in Italy in the VII century b. C. or before, bringing an archaic Indoeuropean language from Asia Minor. Naturally, it adquired secundarily some Italic elements. — He criticizes the opinions of several linguists and as well some theories of nationalistic nature which should be withdrawn now. Archaeologists have silenced linguistic problems which are important, but alien to them

El etrusco como indoeuropeo anatolio: viejos y nuevos argumentos